Skip to main content

Collaboration Priority Matrix
12 × 12 Discipline Intersection

Higher values indicate more critical joint investigation requirements for AHI resolution. The diagonal represents each discipline's internal coherence score (10/10). Off-diagonal values quantify the necessity of cross-disciplinary collaboration, with scores of 8 or above representing non-negotiable investigative partnerships.

COLLAB.MATRIX.V1
LOW
HIGH
INTERACTIVE HEATMAP — TAP OR CLICK CELLS
← SCROLL TO EXPLORE →
Bioelectromag.
Acoustics
Neurosci. (Vest.)
Neuro-otology
Autonomic Med.
Neuroimaging
Biomarker Sci.
Toxicology
Immunology
Epidemiology
Defense / Intel
Psychiatry
Bioelectromag.
10
7
8
6
5
6
4
3
3
4
8
2
Acoustics
7
10
7
8
4
5
3
3
2
3
6
2
Neurosci. (Vest.)
8
7
10
9
8
8
6
4
5
5
5
6
Neuro-otology
6
8
9
10
7
6
5
3
3
5
4
4
Autonomic Med.
5
4
8
7
10
6
7
4
6
5
4
6
Neuroimaging
6
5
8
6
6
10
5
3
5
5
4
4
Biomarker Sci.
4
3
6
5
7
5
10
5
7
6
5
3
Toxicology
3
3
4
3
4
3
5
10
5
6
5
3
Immunology
3
2
5
3
6
5
7
5
10
5
3
4
Epidemiology
4
3
5
5
5
5
6
6
5
10
5
5
Defense / Intel
8
6
5
4
4
4
5
5
3
5
10
3
Psychiatry
2
2
6
4
6
4
3
3
4
5
3
10
SCORE LEGEND
9–10Critical Partnership
7–8High Priority
5–6Significant
3–4Moderate
2Limited Overlap
TOP COLLABORATION PAIRS
9/10
Neurosci. (Vest.) × Neuro-otology
8/10
Bioelectromag. × Defense / Intel
8/10
Bioelectromag. × Neurosci. (Vest.)
8/10
Acoustics × Neuro-otology
8/10
Autonomic Med. × Neurosci. (Vest.)

How Collaboration Scores Are Determined

01

Hypothesis Mapping

Each discipline pair is evaluated against all six competing AHI hypotheses. Pairs that jointly contribute to more hypotheses receive higher base scores.

02

Methodological Complementarity

Disciplines with complementary methodologies (e.g., physics modeling + clinical phenotyping) receive higher scores than those with overlapping methods.

03

Evidence Convergence Potential

Pairs capable of producing jointly interpretable evidence nodes, where one discipline's output directly informs the other's analysis, receive the highest scores.